Effects of predation pressure and nest-site selection on the breeding success of terns in a Finnish archipelago
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51812/of.145291Keywords:
Common Tern, Arctic Tern, conservation, hatching success, fledging success, nest-site selection, nesting habitat, predation, seabirdsAbstract
Studying and quantifying the breeding success of species can help to understand population trends and provide conservation guidance. Here, we studied the breeding success of Arctic Tern (Sterna paradisaea) and Common Tern (Sterna hirundo) colonies in a Natura 2000 site of the Western archipelago of Finland aiming to understand which factors related to nest-site selection and predation pressure best explain breeding success. We monitored 72 tern nests at 4 colonies and observed them during standardized monitoring sessions to record predation attacks on the tern nests. We ran generalized linear models to determine the factors which impact breeding success (hatching and fledging success). Hatching success was high across the 4 colonies with 69% of the eggs hatching, whereas fledging success was low with only 1 colony producing 14 fledglings while all other colonies had zero fledglings surviving (12% total fledging success). Regarding nest-site selection, our results demonstrate that a greater proportion of vegetation cover increases breeding success, likely through better nest concealment against predators. Nests in smaller colonies with a higher nest density and located closer to the colony center also produced more hatchlings and fledglings. Most predation likely happened during the chick stage, while our extrapolation predicted that predation accounts for at least 94% of all chick losses, indicating that predator control would aid breeding success of tern colonies in West Finland substantially.
References
Allen Smith, P., Grant Gilchrist, H. & Smith, J. N. M. 2007: Effects of Nest Habitat, Food, and Parental Behavior on Shorebird Nest Success. — The Condor 109: 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/109.1.15
Anon 1993: Decision on starting a conservation area by the Environmental Agency of Vaasan Lääni; Nr 127A-
regarding an archipelago area of Torsö and Hällgrund. 8 pp.
Ardia, D. R., Pérez, J. H. & Clotfelter, E. D. 2006: Nest box orientation affects internal temperature and nest site selection by Tree Swallows. — Journal of Field Ornithology 77: 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/
j.1557-9263.2006.00064.x
Arnold, J. M., Hatch, J. J. & Nisbet, I. C. T. 2004: Seasonal declines in reproductive success of the common tern Sterna hirundo: timing or parental quality? — Journal of Avian Biology 35: 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/
j.0908-8857.2004.03059.x
Austin, O. L. 1940: Some aspects of individual distribution in the Cape Cod tern colonies. — Bird-Banding 11(4): 155–169. https://doi.org/10.2307/4509635
Becker, P. H. 1995: Effects of Coloniality on Gull Predation on Common Tern (Sterna hirundo) Chicks. — Colonial Waterbirds 18: 11–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1521394.
Braasch, A., Schauroth, C. & Becker, P. H. 2009: Post-fledging body mass as a determinant of subadult survival in Common Terns Sterna hirundo. — Journal of Ornithology 150: 401–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0362-2
BirdLife International 2024: IUCN Red List for birds. — Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/(Accessed 17 September 2024)
Buehler, R., Bosco, L., Arlettaz, R. & Jacot, A. 2017: Nest site preferences of the Woodlark (Lullula arborea) and its association with artificial nest predation. — Acta Oecologica 78: 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2016.12.004
Burger, J. & Lesser, F. 1978. Selection of Colony Sites and Nest Sites by Common Terns Sterna Hirundo in Ocean County, New Jersey. — Ibis 120: 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1978.tb06810.x
Burness, G. P. & Morris, R. D. 1992: Shelters Decrease Gull Predation on Chicks at a Common Tern Colony. — Journal of Field Ornithology 63: 186–189.
Burnham, K. K., Burnham, J. L., Konkel, B. W. & Johnson, J. A. 2017: Significant decline observed in Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea population in northwest Greenland. — Seabird 30: 39–50. https://doi.org/10.61350/sbj.30.39
Burthe, S., Wanless, S., Newell, M., Butler, A. & Daunt, F. 2014: Assessing the vulnerability of the marine bird community in the western North Sea to climate change and other anthropogenic impacts. — Marine Ecology Progress Series 507: 277–295. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10849.
Cairns, D. K. 1988: Seabirds as Indicators of Marine Food Supplies. — Biological Oceanography 5(4): 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/01965581.1987.10749517
Carney, K. M. & Sydeman, W. J. 1999: A review of human disturbance effects on nesting colonial waterbirds. — Waterbirds 68–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1521995
Chapdelaine, G., Brousseau, P., Anderson, R. & Marsan, R. 1985: Breeding ecology of common and arctic terns in the Mingan Archipelago, Quebec. — Colonial Waterbirds 8(2): 166–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/
Courtney, P. & Blokpoel, H. 1983: Distribution and numbers of common terns on the lower Great Lakes during 1900-1980: a review. — Waterbirds 6: 107–120. https://doi.org/10.2307/1520977
Dias, M. P., Martin, R., Pearmain, E. J., ... & Croxall, J. P. 2019: Threats to seabirds: a global assessment. — Biological Conservation 237: 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.033
Donehower, C. E., Bird, D. M., Hall, C. S. & Kress, S. W. 2007: Effects of gull predation and predator control on tern nesting success at Eastern Egg Rock, Maine. — Waterbirds 30(1): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695(2007)030[0029:EOGPAP]2.0.CO;2
Dunn, E. K. 1975: The role of environmental factors in the growth of tern chicks. — The Journal of Animal Ecology 44(3): 743–754. https://doi.org/10.2307/3716
European Commission: Directorate-General for Environment & Sundseth, K. 2015: The EU birds and habitats directives: For nature and people in Europe. — Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/49288
Gómez-Serrano, M. Á. & López-López, P. 2014: Nest Site Selection by Kentish Plover Suggests a Trade-Off between Nest-Crypsis and Predator Detection Strategies. — PLOS ONE 9: e107121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107121
González-Solís, J., Becker, P. H., Jover, L. & Ruiz, X. 2004: Individual changes underlie age-specific pattern of laying date and egg-size in female common terns Sterna hirundo. — Journal of Ornithology 145: 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-004-0023-z
Guillemette, M. & Brousseau, P. 2001: Does culling predatory gulls enhance the productivity of breeding common terns? — Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00564.x
Hatch, S. A. & Hatch, M. A. 1990: Components of breeding productivity in a marine bird community: key factors and concordance. — Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 1680–1690. https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-248.
Hario, M. 1994: Reproductive performance of the nominate Lesser Black-backed Gull under the pressure of Herring Gull predation. — Ornis Fennica 71: 1–10.
Hario, M., Rintala, J. & Tanner, J. 2009: Culling project on herring gulls of the central Gulf of Finland 2004–2007. — Riista- ja kalatalous – Tutkimuksia 4/2009. Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute. Helsinki, Finland. (In Finnish with English abstract)
Hario, M. & Rintala, J. 2016: Population trends in herring gulls (Larus argentatus), great black-backed gulls (Larus marinus) and lesser black-backed gulls (Larus fuscus fuscus) in Finland. — Waterbirds 39(sp1): 10–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1675/063.039.sp107
Hawksley, O. 1957: Ecology of a breeding population of Arctic Terns. — Bird-Banding 28(2): 57–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/4510623
Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. & Liukko, U.-M. (eds.) 2019: The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. — Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki, Finland.
Kim, S.-Y. & Monaghan, P. 2005: Effects of vegetation on nest microclimate and breeding performance of lesser black-backed gulls (Larus fuscus). — Journal of Ornithology 146: 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-005-0077-6
Knief, U., Bregnballe, T., Alfarwi, I., ... & Courtens, W. 2024: Highly pathogenic avian influenza causes mass mortality in Sandwich tern (Thalasseus sandvicensis) breeding colonies across northwestern Europe. — bioRxiv (preprint). https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.
540367
Langham, N. P. E. 1968: The comparative biology of terns, Sterna spp. — Doctoral dissertation, Durham University. https://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8606/ (Accessed 31 October 2024)
Latif, Q. S., Heath, S. K. & Rotenberry, J. T. 2012: How avian nest site selection responds to predation risk: testing an ‘adaptive peak hypothesis.’ — Journal of Animal Ecology 81: 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01895.x
Lemmetyinen, R. 1971: Nest defence behaviour of Common and Arctic Terns and its effects on the success achieved by predators. — Ornis Fennica 48(1): 13–24.
Lima, S. L. 2009: Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. — Biological Reviews 84: 485–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00085.x
Long, J. A. 2022: jtools: Analysis and Presentation of Social Scientific Data. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06610
Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M., Patil, S. I., Waggoner, P. & Makowski, D. 2021: performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models. — Journal of Open Source Software 6: 3139. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139
Mallory, M. L. 2016: Reactions of ground-nesting marine birds to human disturbance in the Canadian Arctic. — Arctic Science 2: 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2015-0029
Martin, T. E. 1993: Nest Predation and Nest Sites: New perspectives on old patterns. — BioScience 43: 523–532. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311947
Ministry of the Environment & Finnish Environment Institute 2019: The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species: data download (version 1). — Downloaded from https://punainenkirja.laji.fi/publications (Accessed 27 March 2024)
Monaghan, P., Uttley, J. D., Burns, M. D., Thaine, C. & Blackwood, J. 1989: The Relationship Between Food Supply, Reproductive Effort and Breeding Success in Arctic Terns Sterna paradisaea. — Journal of Animal Ecology 58: 261–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/4999
Morris, D. W. 2003: How can we apply theories of habitat selection to wildlife conservation and management? — Wildlife Research 30: 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr02028
Nagelkerke, N. J. 1991: A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. — biometrika 78(3): 691–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
Nisbet, I. C. T. & Welton, M. J. 1984: Seasonal Variations in Breeding Success of Common Terns: Consequences of Predation. — The Condor 86: 53–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367345
Nisbet, I. C., Iles, D., Kaneb, A., Mostello, C. S. & Jenouvrier, S. 2020: Breeding performance of Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) does not decline among older age classes. — The Auk 137(3): ukaa022. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/ukaa022
Nordström, M., Högmander, J., Laine, J., Nummelin, J., Laanetu, N. & Korpimäki, E. 2003: Effects of feral
mink removal on seabirds, waders and passerines on small islands in the Baltic Sea. — Biological Conservation 109: 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00162-3
O’Hara, C. C., Frazier, M. & Halpern, B. S. 2021: At-risk marine biodiversity faces extensive, expanding, and intensifying human impacts. — Science 372: 84–87. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe6731
Parker, K. C. 1986 Partitioning of Foraging Space and Nest Sites in a Desert Shrubland Bird Community. — The American Midland Naturalist 115: 255–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2425862
Piatt, J. F., Harding, A. M., Shultz, M., Speckman, S. G., Van Pelt, T. I., Drew, G. S., Kettle & A. B. 2007: Seabirds as indicators of marine food supplies: Cairns revisited. — Marine Ecology Progress Series 352: 221–234. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07078
Pinaud, D. & Weimerskirch, H. 2002: Ultimate and proximate factors affecting the breeding performance of a marine top-predator. — Oikos 99: 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990114.x
R Core Team 2022: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. — Version 4.2.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
Robinson, J. A. & Hamer, K. C. 1998: Predation of Arctic Tern chicks by rabbits in northeast England. — Seabird: 41–43.
Robinson, J. A., Hamer, K. C. & Chivers, L. S. 2001: Contrasting Brood Sizes in Common and Arctic Terns: The Roles of Food Provisioning Rates and Parental Brooding. — The Condor 103: 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/103.1.108
Robinson, R.A. 2005: BirdFacts: profiles of birds occurring in Britain & Ireland (v1.24, June 2009). — BTO Research Report 407. BTO, Thetford. http://www.bto.org/birdfacts (Accessed 31 October 2024)
Rönkä, M., Saari, L., Hario, M., Hänninen, J. & Lehikoinen, E. 2011: Breeding success and breeding population trends of waterfowl: implications for monitoring. — Wildlife Biology 17: 225–239. https://doi.org/10.2981/09-064
Schreiber, J. & Kissling, D. W. 2005: Factors affecting the breeding success of Arctic Terns Sterna paradisaea in a colony at Kaldbaksbotnur, Faroe Islands. — Atlantic Seabirds 7: 97–105.
Scopel, L. C. & Diamond, A. W. 2017: The case for lethal control of gulls on seabird colonies. — The Journal of Wildlife Management 81(4): 572–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21233
Scopel, L. C. & Diamond, A. W. 2018: Predation and food–weather interactions drive colony collapse in a managed metapopulation of Arctic Terns (Sterna paradisaea). — Canadian Journal of Zoology 96(1): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2016-0281
Scopel, L. C., Diamond, A. W., Kress, S. W., Hards, A. R. & Shannon, P. 2018: Seabird diets as bioindicators of Atlantic herring recruitment and stock size: a new tool for ecosystem-based fisheries management. — Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 75: 1215–1229. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2017-0140
Seibold, S., Hempel, A., Piehl, S., Bässler, C., Brandl, R., Rösner, S. & Müller, J. 2013: Forest vegetation structure has more influence on predation risk of artificial ground nests than human activities. — Basic and Applied Ecology 14: 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2013.09.003
Shannon, T. & Thurgate, H. 2014: Strangford Lough-Seabird Predation Report 2014. — Northern Ireland Seabird Report 2014. Downloaded from https://www.bto.org/sites/default/files/u41/NI-Seabird-Report-2014-web-version.pdf) (Accessed 12 September 2024)
Suddaby, D. & Ratcliffe, N. 1997: The Effects of Fluctuating Food Availability on Breeding Arctic Terns (Sterna paradisaea). — The Auk 114: 524–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089260
Sulkava, S., Tornberg, R. & Koivusaari, J. (1997): Diet of the White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilia in Finland. — Ornis Fennica 74(2): 65–78.
Syrová, M., Hromádková, T., Pavel, V. & Veselý, P. 2020: Responses of nesting Arctic terns (Sterna paradisaea) to disturbance by humans. — Polar Biology 43: 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-020-02641-2
Tjur, T. 2009: Coefficients of determination in logistic regression models—A new proposal: The coefficient of discrimination. — The American Statistician 63(4): 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.08210
Towns, D. R., Byrd, G. V., Jones, H. P., Rauzon, M. J., Russell, J. C. & Wilcox, C. 2011: Impacts of introduced predators on seabirds. — In Seabird Islands: Ecology, Invasion, and Restoration (ed. Mulder, C. P. H., Anderson, W. B., Towns, D. R. & Bellingham, P. J.): 56–90. New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199735693.003.0003
Van Donk, S., Shamoun-Baranes, J., Bouten, W., Van Der Meer, J. & Camphuysen, K. C. J. 2020: Individual differences in foraging site fidelity are not related to time-activity budgets in Herring Gulls. — Ibis 162: 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12697
Venables, W. & Ripley, B. 2002: Modern Applied Statistics with S. — Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
Whittam, R. 1997: The effects of predation on the breeding biology and behaviour of roseate, Arctic, and common terns nesting on Country Island, Nova Scotia. — Thesis, Dalhousie University. Halifax, NS, Canada.
Whittam, R. M. & Leonard, M. L. 1999: Predation and breeding success in roseate terns (Sterna dougallii). — Canadian Journal of Zoology 77: 851–856. https://doi.org/10.1139/z99-047
Wickham, H. 2016: ggplot2. — Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
Wistbacka, R. Wistbacka, P., Wistbacka K. O., Bäck A. & Sandvik, E. 2006: Inventering av fågelfaunan i Torsö skärgård 2006. — Arbetsrapport. Working report on the avifauna of Torsö. (In Swedish)
Wistbacka, R., Liljeqvist, F., Wistbacka, P., Höglund, J., Sundelin, A., Back, R. & Hultèn, T. 2022: Studie av förekomst och häckningsframgång hos silltrut (Larus f. fuscus) i Jakobstadsnejden sommaren 2022 (Study on impact of Herring gull predation on Larus fuscus and other species on Hällgrund). — Arbetsrapport, Working report. (In Swedish)
Zeale, M. R. K., Davidson-Watts, I. & Jones, G. 2012: Home range use and habitat selection by barbastelle bats (Barbastella barbastellus): implications for conservation. — Journal of Mammalogy 93: 1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.1644/11-MAMM-A-366.1
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Versions
- 2024-12-09 (2)
- 2024-11-19 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Enzo Degot, Ralf Wistbacka, Konsta Kaasalainen, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Laura Bosco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
