Home range sizes and nychthemeral habitat uses by the Northern Shoveler (Spatula clypeata) on prenuptial stopovers in Vendée marshes, western France
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51812/of.142037Keywords:
Northern shoveler, freshwater invertebrates, habitat use, wetlands, spring migrationAbstract
The wetlands of Marais breton (MB) and Marais poitevin (MP) on the French Atlantic coast are commonly used by several duck species, especially as stopover sites during the prenuptial migration. Understanding the ecological requirements of Anatidae at spring stopover sites is important to define appropriate management actions that might have a carry over effect on the subsequent reproduction success. This study focused on the Northern Shoveler (Spatula clypeata), a species that regularly visits the two marshes during spring and fall migrations and is highly dependent on freshwater invertebrates as the food resource. Fifteen Northern Shovelers were equipped with GPS/GSM tags and monitored during their stopover in both marshes in 2020 and 2021. The aims of the study were to understand the habitat use on stopover sites and relate home range (HR) size with characteristics of the feeding habitats (such as freshwater invertebrates’ density and diversity). The HR area of the studied individuals was mainly constituted of ponds in MB (83% of the HR) and wet meadows in MP (71% of the HR). The Northern Shovelers equipped with tag spent more than 72 consecutive hours in 31 wetlands, using them during the day, at night or all day. The diurnal visited sites were deep ponds that were sparsely vegetated and dominated by microcrustaceans, whereas the nocturnal visited sites were wet meadows or ponds with high aquatic vegetation cover and high invertebrate taxonomic diversity. The 31 described sites appeared to be rich in freshwater invertebrates, with no significant difference in invertebrate densities between the diurnal and nocturnal sites. HR sizes were highly homogenous between the two study sites (MB and MP), between sexes or between age classes. In conclusion, according to this study, an appropriate HR for the Northern Shoveler at spring stopover is 8.49 ± 5.95 km² (mean ± standard error).
References
Ankney, C. D. & Afton, A. D. 1988: Bioenergetics of breeding Northern Shovelers: diet, nutrient reserves, clutch size, and incubation. — The Condor 90(2): 459–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368574
Arzel, C. 2006: Ecologie de la Sarcelle d’hiver et des autres canards de surface: connexion entre les sites d´hivernage, les haltes migratoires et les zones de reproduction [Doctoral thesis]. — Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier.
Arzel, C. & Elmberg, J. 2004: Time use, foraging behavior and microhabitat use in a temporary guild of spring-
staging dabbling ducks (Anas spp.). — Ornis Fennica 81(4): 157–168. https://ornisfennica.journal.fi/article/view/133623
Balcombe, C. K., Anderson, J. T., Fortney, R. H. & Kordek, W. S. 2005: Aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblages in mitigated and natural wetlands. — Hydrobiologia 541(1): 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-5706-1
Baldassarre, G. A. & Bolen, E. G. 2006: Waterfowl ecology and management (2nd ed.). — Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida. https://doi.org/10.2307/5901
Batt, B. D. J., Anderson, M. G. & Afton, A. D. 1992: Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. — University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Bengtsson, D., Avril, A., Gunnarsson, G., Elmberg, J., Söderquist, P., Norevik, G., Tolf, C., Safi, K., Fiedler, W., Wikelski, M., Olsen, B. & Waldenström, J. 2014: Movements, home-range size and habitat selection of Mallards during autumn migration. — PLOS ONE 9(6): e100764. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100764
Bolduc, F. & Afton, A. D. 2004: Relationships between wintering waterbirds and invertebrates, sediments and hydrology of coastal marsh ponds. — Waterbirds:
The International Journal of Waterbird Biology
(3): 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695(2004)027[0333:RBWWAI]2.0.CO;2
Boreham, S. 1994: A study of freshwater invertebrate distribution and abundance from fieldwork by secondary school students in an Epping Forest pond. — Journal of Biological Education 28(1): 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1994.9655362
Börger, L., Dalziel, B. D. & Fryxell, J. M. 2008: Are
there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. — Ecology Letters 11(6): 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01182.x
Broyer, J. & Curtet, L. 2012: Biodiversity and fish farming intensification in French fishpond systems. — Hydrobiologia 694(1): 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1162-5
Calenge, C. 2006: The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. — Ecological Modelling 197(3–4): 516–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017
Cramp, S. & Simmons, K. E. L. 1977: Handbook of the birds of Europe the Middle East and North Africa: the birds of the Western Paleartic. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Crome, F. 1985: An experimental investigation of filter-feeding on zooplankton by some specialized waterfowl. — Australian Journal of Zoology 33(6): 849–862. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9850849
Davis, C. A. & Bidwell, J. R. 2008: Response of aquatic invertebrates to vegetation management and agriculture. — Wetlands 28(3): 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1672/07-156.1
De Leon, M. T. & Smith, L. M. 1999: Behavior of migrating shorebirds at North Dakota prairie potholes. — The Condor 101(3): 645–654. https://doi.org/10.2307/1370194
Dow, H. & Fredga, S. 1985: Selection of nest sites by
a hole‐nesting duck, the Goldeneye Bucephala
clangula. — Ibis 127: 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1474-919X.1985.TB05034.X
DuBowy, P. J. 1985: Feeding ecology and behavior of postbreeding male Blue-winged Teal and Northern Shovelers. — Canadian Journal of Zoology 63(6): 1292–1297. https://doi.org/10.1139/z85-194
Duncan, P., Hewison, A. J. M., Houte, S., Rosoux, R., Tournebize, T., Dubs, F., Burel, F. & Bretagnolle, V. 1999: Long-term changes in agricultural practices and wildfowling in an internationally important wetland, and their effects on the guild of wintering ducks. — Journal of Applied Ecology 36(1): 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00363.x
Eldridge, J. 1990: Aquatic invertebrates important for waterfowl production. — In Waterfowl management handbook (ed. Cross, D. H. & Vohs, P.): 1–7. — Fish and Wildlife Leaflet, Fort Collins.
Euliss, N. H., Jarvis, R. L. & Gilmer, D. S. 1997: Relationship between waterfowl nutrition and condition on agricultural drainwater ponds in the Tulare Basin, California: waterfowl body composition. — Wetlands 17(1): 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160722
Fairbairn, S. E. & Dinsmore, J. J. 2001: Local and land-
scape-level influences on wetland bird communities
of the prairie pothole region of Iowa, USA. —
Wetlands 21(1): 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0041:LALLIO]2.0.CO;2
Fritz, H., Guillemain, M. & Guerin, S. 2000: Changes
in the frequency of prospecting fly-overs by Marsh Harriers Circus aeruginosus in relation to short term fluctuations in dabbling duck abundance. — Ardea 88(1): 9–16. https://ardea.nou.nu/ardea_show_abstract.php?lang=nl&nr=81
Ganter, B. & Cooke, F. 1996: Pre-incubation feeding activities and energy budgets of Snow Geese: can food on the breeding grounds influence fecundity? — Oecologia 106: 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328594
Gauthier, G., Bêty, J. & Hobson, K. A. 2003: Are greater Snow Geese capital breeders? New evidence from a stable-isotope model. — Ecology 84(12): 3250–3264. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0613
Guéret, J.-P. 2010: Anatidés nicheurs en Marais poitevin - Synthèse de l’enquête 2010. — LPO, Parc interrégional du Marais poitevin.
Guillemain, M., Arzel, C., Legagneux, P., Elmberg, J., Fritz, H., Lepley, M., Pin, C., Arnaud, A. & Massez, G.
: Predation risk constrains the plasticity of
foraging behaviour in teals, Anas crecca: a flyway-
level circumannual approach. — Animal Behaviour 73(5): 845–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.
019
Guillemain, M., Fritz, H. & Guillon, N. 2000: The use of an artificial wetland by Shoveler Anas clypeata in Western France: The role of food resources. — Revue d’Écologie (La Terre et La Vie) 55(3): 263–274. https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.2000.2330
Guillemain, M., Fritz, H., Guillon, N. & Simon, G. 2002: Ecomorphology and coexistence in dabbling ducks: the role of lamellar density and body length in winter. — Oikos 98(3): 547–551.
Harrell, F. 2024: Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous (5.1-3). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/index.html
Heitmeyer, M. E. & Vohs, J. P. A. 1984: Characteristics of wetlands used by migrant dabbling ducks in Oklahoma, USA. — Wildfowl 35: 61–70. https://wildfowl.wwt.org.uk/index.php/wildfowl/article/view/689
Holopainen, S., Arzel, C., Dessborn, L., Elmberg, J., Gunnarsson, G., Nummi, P., Pöysä, H. & Sjöberg, K. 2015: Habitat use in ducks breeding in boreal freshwater wetlands: a review. — European Journal of Wildlife Research 61(3): 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-015-0921-9
Hulbert, I. A. R. & French, J. 2001: The accuracy of GPS for wildlife telemetry and habitat mapping. — Journal of Applied Ecology 38(4): 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00624.x
Husson, F., Josse, J., Le, S. & Mazet, J. 2024: FactoMineR: Multivariate Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Mining (2.11). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FactoMineR/index.html
Johnson, D. H. 1980: The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. — Ecology 61(1): 65–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937156
Kaminski, R. M. & Prince, H. H. 1981: Dabbling duck activity and foraging responses to aquatic macroinvertebrates. — The Auk 98(1): 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/98.1.115
Kirk, M., Esler, D., Iverson, S. A. & Boyd, W. S. 2008: Movements of wintering Surf Scoters: predator responses to different prey landscapes. — Oecologia 155(4): 859–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0947-0
Klaassen, R. H. G., Strandberg, R., Hake, M. & Alerstam, T. 2008: Flexibility in daily travel routines causes regional variation in bird migration speed. — Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62(9): 1427–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0572-x
Kraan, C., van Gils, J. A., Spaans, B., Dekinga, A., Bijleveld, A. I., van Roomen, M., Kleefstra, R. & Piersma, T. 2009: Landscape-scale experiment demonstrates that wadden sea intertidal flats are used to capacity by molluscivore migrant shorebirds. — Journal of Animal Ecology 78(6): 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01564.x
Lameris, T. K., Kölzsch, A., Dokter, A. M. & Nolet, B. A. 2017: A novel harness for attaching tracking devices to migratory geese. — Goose Bulletin 22: 25–30.
Lameris, T. K., Müskens, G. J. D. M., Kölzsch, A., Dokter, A. M., Van der Jeugd, H. P. & Nolet, B. A. 2018: Effects of harness-attached tracking devices on survival, migration, and reproduction in three species of migratory waterfowl. — Animal Biotelemetry 6(1): 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-018-0153-3
Le Corre, N. 2009: Le dérangement de l’avifaune sur les sites naturels protégés de Bretagne : état des lieux, enjeux et réflexions autour d’un outil d’étude des interactions hommes/oiseaux [Doctoral thesis]. — Université de Brest.
Legagneux, P. 2007: Compromis entre alimentation et risque de prédation chez les canards hivernants : une approche multi-échelles [Doctoral thesis]. — Université Louis Pasteur de Strasbourg.
Legagneux, P., Blaize, C., Latraube, F., Gautier, J. & Bretagnolle, V. 2009: Variation in home-range size and movements of wintering dabbling ducks. — Journal of Ornithology 150(1): 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0333-7
Ma, Z., Cai, Y., Li, B. & Chen, J. 2010: Managing Wetland Habitats for Waterbirds: An International Perspective. — Wetlands 30(1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-009-0001-6
Matsubara, T., Sugimori, F., Iwabuchi, K. & Aoyama, K. 1994: The relation between the feeding activity of wintering shovelers (Anas clypeata) and the horizontal distribution of zooplankton in Lake Teganuma, Japan. — Hydrobiologia 294(3): 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021298
Moore, F. R., Kerlinger, P. & Simons, T. R. 1990: Stopover on a gulf coast barrier island by spring trans-gulf migrants. — The Wilson Bulletin 102(3): 487–500.
Moreau, A., Dupuy, C., Bocher, P. & Farau, S. 2021: Morphological, calorific and nutritive characteristics
of 656 freshwater invertebrates taxa. — Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e70214. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e70214
Nudds, T. D. & Bowlby, J. N. 1984: Predator–prey size relationships in North American dabbling ducks. — Canadian Journal of Zoology 62(10): 2002–2008. https://doi.org/10.1139/z84-293
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., Barbour, M., Bedward, M., Bolker, B., Borcard, D., Carvalho, G., Chirico, M., … Weedon, J. 2024: vegan: Community Ecology Package (2.6-6.1). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html
Olson, E. J., Engstrom, E. S., Doeringsfeld, M. R. & Bellig, R. 1995: Abundance and distribution of macroinvertebrates in relation to macrophyte communities in a prairie marsh, Swan Lake, Minnesota. — Journal of Freshwater Ecology 10(4): 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.1995.9663455
Pirot, J. Y. & Pont, D. 1987: Le Canard souchet (Anas clypeata L.) hivernant en Camargue : alimentation, comportement et dispersion nocturne. — Revue d’Écologie (La Terre et La Vie) 42: 59–79. https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.1987.5395
Poisbleau, M. 2005: Quelle utilisation des hormones dans l’étude des relations de dominance sociale et la compréhension des stratégies d’hivernage?: cas des canards de surface et des bernaches cravants [Doctoral thesis]. — Université de Montpellier II.
Pöysä, H. 1983: Morphology-mediated niche organization in a guild of dabbling ducks. — Ornis Scandinavica 14(4): 317–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/3676325
QGIS Development Team. 2009: QGIS Geographic Information System (2.18.13) [En]. — Open Source Geospatial Foundation, USA. http://qgis.osgeo.org
R Core Team. 2022: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Rempel, R. S. & Rodgers, A. R. 1997: Effects of differential correction on accuracy of a GPS animal location system. — The Journal of Wildlife Management 61(2): 525–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802611
Rolando, A. 2002: On the ecology of home range in birds. — Revue d’Écologie (La Terre et La Vie) 57(1): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.2002.2381
Romare, P., Berg, S., Lauridsen, T. & Jeppesen, E. 2003: Spatial and temporal distribution of fish and
zooplankton in a shallow lake. — Freshwater Biology 48(8): 1353–1362. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-
2003.01081.x
Safine, D. E. & Lindberg, M. S. 2008: Nest habitat selection of White-Winged Scoters on Yukon Flats, Alaska. — The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120(3): 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1676/06-157.1
Thorp, J. H. & Rogers, D. C. 2011: Field guide to freshwater invertebrates of North America. — Academic Press, Elsevier, Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-61804-3
Tietje, W. D. & Teer, J. G. 1996: Winter feeding ecology of Northern Shovelers on freshwater and saline wetlands in South Texas. — The Journal of Wildlife Management 60(4): 843–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802385
Trolliet, B., Girard, O. & Ibanez, F. 2016: Les anatidés nicheurs du Marais breton. — Faune sauvage 313: 4–10.
Van Moorter, B., Rolandsen, C. M., Basille, M. & Gaillard, J.-M. 2016: Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection. — Journal of Animal Ecology 85(1): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12394
Verheijen, B. H. F., Webb, E. B., Brasher, M. G. & Hagy, H. M. 2024: Long-term changes in autumn–winter harvest distributions vary among duck species, months, and subpopulations. — Ecology and Evolution 14(6): e11331. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11331
Webb, E. B., Smith, L. M., Vrtiska, M. P. & Lagrange, T. G. 2010: Effects of local and landscape variables on wetland bird habitat use during migration through the rainwater basin. — Journal of Wildlife Management 74(1): 109–119. https://doi.org/10.2193/2008-577
Worton, B. J. 1989: Kernel Methods for Estimating the Utilization Distribution in Home-Range Studies. — Ecology 70(1): 164–168. https://doi.org/10.2307/
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Versions
- 2024-10-18 (2)
- 2024-10-13 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Axelle Moreau, Clément Rousseau, Pierrick Bocher, Christine Dupuy, Sébastien Farau
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
